The Energy Policy Act of 1992 and Louisiana's Electric Power Industry
February 1993
by Alan A. Troy, P.E.
The Energy Policy Act of 1992 is designed to encourage competition
in energy markets. A persistent capacity surplus discourages new
entrants into the Louisiana market (See chart on back). The Act
makes it easier for utilities to own unregulated independent power
facilities and invest in power projects in other states and countries.
Two large multi-state investor-owned utility holding companies operating
in Louisiana are making such investments. The smaller, independent
Louisiana utilities lack the resources for such ventures and are
likely to stay close to their home bases.
The Act amends the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935 (PUHCA)
by creating a new class of power producers, called exempt wholesale
generators (EWG's), that are not subject to PUHCA and are exclusively
engaged in owning and/or operating facilities generating electricity
for sale at wholesale. They can be independent companies, or the
utilities can own them. In addition, the utilities can now make
foreign investments without SEC approval, within certain restrictions.
Entergy Corporation, the multi-state New Orleans based holding
company for Louisiana Power & Light and New Orleans Public Service
Co., has transferred two of its Arkansas plants to its independent
power subsidiary, Entergy Power, Inc., and is investing $515 million
in two utilities in Argentina through it Entergy Services subsidiary.
Dallas based Central & South West Corp., the holding company
for Southwestern Electric Power Co., Shreveport, is participating
in independent power projects in Florida and Washington State through
its CSW Energy subsidiary. Spokesmen for the other utilities operating
in the state indicated they are not presently seeking to own EWG's
or invest in foreign countries, but might consider it in the future.
A key provision of the Act mandates open access of the transmission
systems of private and public utilities to all wholesale power producers
provided they pay the entire cost of transmission as determined
by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). This could make
it easier for the Louisiana Energy and Power Authority and Cajun
Electric Cooperative, which have very little transmission capability,
to gain access to potential new members. Also, Louisiana's fourteen
cogenerators presently selling power to Louisiana utilities now
have the right to have it wheeled anywhere they choose.
Although FERC is empowered to order wheeling, it is not required
to do so if service to the transmitting utilities' existing customers
is impaired. Since transmission lines are in the rate base established
by the Louisiana Public Service Commission (LPSC), there will have
to be some collaboration between the FERC and the LPSC on rates.
Pricing is sure to dominate the issues open access has created.
The Act directs state regulatory commissions to look at the effects
of wholesale power purchases on utility cost of capital and to consider
utility investments in energy conservation and efficiency in the
rate-making process so such investments are as profitable as those
in new generating plants. The idea is to provide a financial incentive
for utilities to use measures other than building new power plants
to meet their customers' needs. Even without this incentive every
Louisiana utility is planning or is implementing such measures.
While the country finally has an energy policy, many of the regulations
needed to implement it are not in place. The burden of providing
this regulatory framework is still the domain of the FERC and state
public service commissions as it was before the Act was passed.
In the months to come it will be interesting to see what they do.
| |
|
|
| |
 |
Note: In 1990
Entergy Corp reduced its total system capability by 809 megawatts
when it sold two Arkansas power plants to its independent power
subsidiary, Entergy Power |
| |
Source: Annual Reports of Central
Louisiana Electric Co.,
Gulf States Utilities, Southwestern Electric Power Co.,
Entergy Corp. SEC 10K Forms and Company Representative.
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LOUISIANA INVESTOR-OWNED ELECTRIC
UTILITIES
|
|
PEAK LOAD (MEGAWATTS) 1987-1991
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| UTILITY |
|
1987
|
1988
|
1989
|
1990
|
1991
|
|
| CLECO |
|
1,141
|
1,123
|
1,148
|
1,218
|
1,233
|
|
| GSU |
|
4,991
|
4,910
|
5,040
|
4,910
|
4,991
|
|
| ENTERGY |
|
11,272
|
11,437
|
11,478
|
12,163
|
11,831
|
|
| SWEPCO |
|
3,085
|
3,153
|
3,045
|
3,252
|
3,200
|
|
| Total
Peak Load |
|
20,489
|
20,623
|
20,711
|
21,543
|
21,255
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LOUISIANA INVESTOR- OWNED ELECTRIC
UTILITIES
|
|
TOTAL SYSTEM CAPABILITY AT TIME
OF PEAK (Megawatts) 1987-1991
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| UTILITY |
|
1987
|
1988
|
1989
|
1990
|
1991
|
|
| CLECO |
|
1,708
|
1,701
|
1,706
|
1,706
|
1,706
|
|
| GSU |
|
6,926
|
6,866
|
6,609
|
6,553
|
6,471
|
|
| ENTERGY |
|
15,884
|
15,460
|
15,460
|
14,403
|
14,245
|
|
| SWEPCO |
|
4,499
|
4,499
|
4,454
|
4,464
|
4,464
|
|
| Total
System Capability |
|
29,017
|
28,526
|
28,229
|
27,126
|
26,886
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Net
Reserve |
|
8,528.00
|
7,903.00
|
7,518.00
|
5,583.00
|
5,631.00
|
|
| Percent
Reserve Margin |
|
41.62%
|
38.32%
|
36.30%
|
25.92%
|
26.49%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|